All Categories
Featured
Table of Contents
Secret difficulties include recognizing and handling these dangers efficiently, stabilizing worker needs with compliance, and adjusting MTC guidelines for safe and cost-effective movement. If handled well, remote work can be a strategic advantage for multinationals, offering operational continuity and access to skill. Relying on out-of-date guidelines could create liabilities, such as unanticipated tax exposure and compliance problems.
Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.
Words by Kevin McKenna, Elder Advisor, EMIR Mirages often deceive the eye in the desert, promising water and relief where there is none. Similarly, the Middle East, at the moment, can appear daunting to international magnate who incorrectly look at it as one uniform bloc. Unlike mirages, and despite geopolitical stress in the wider region, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' potential is no illusion.
Lots of regional leaders of global companies still have a hard time to unshackle themselves from mistaken beliefs and biases held by an international HQ that frequently looks at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. International spending plan holders' frequently misguided viewpoints can cause missed opportunities and prevent growth. With over a decade of experience encouraging local business leaders in the Middle East, I have actually seen how important it is to make the case for the area by focusing on these five basic actions.

This location also operates really differently from our domestic market, so don't expect the same linear paths to development and timelines." This strategy needs robust preparation, clear interaction, a deep regional network and an abundant understanding of the local organization environment since, ultimately, you need to deliver on that promised development.
By eliminating mistaken beliefs and engaging proactively, regional CEOs can unlock the area's real potential, transforming viewed mirages into an oasis of opportunities waiting to be discovered.
Arrange a session with our specialists to explore how YCP can assist you in resolving your service challenges.
Actionable Tips for Mastering the 2026 Regional LandscapeLikewise, regarding Israel's controversial policies of limiting humanitarian aid into Gaza, the Trump administration has followed Netanyahu's lead. Israel's complete blockade of Gaza from March 2 through mid-May sparked a remarkable deterioration in humanitarian conditions. In May, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli- and U.S.-backed alternative to the UN aid distribution system in Gaza, began operations at 4 circulation websites.
Taken together, these policies show two linked components of the Trump administration's technique to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's preferences and a deprioritization of humanitarian needs. The administration has actually not pushed back on the Israeli federal government's plans to occupy Gaza City and forcibly leave Palestinians into a smaller sized location of Gaza.
He subsequently posted on social media that the only way to get captives out of Gaza is when Hamas is "challenged and damaged," apparently using implied assistance for Israel's expanding operations. The Trump administration's contented technique to Gaza's worsening humanitarian situationmarked by a formal declaration of scarcity in parts of Gazaunderscores the terrible effect of its acquiescence to the Israeli government's refusal to supply sufficient help to the besieged territory. They can best be recorded by unpacking how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave reacted. Not surprisingly, their reactions differ considerably in all three cases. Their reactions likewise reflect the growing variation in between these 2 local powers as they pursue extensively varying strategies for how to shape the Middle East's emerging order.
It has actually signified a willingness to utilize force whenever and wherever hazards occur. This determination has actually translated into ever-bolder military interventions across the region that have redrawn the Middle East's balance of power. Israel has actually not equated these military gains into withstanding strategic wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's existing center of gravitythe important for economic diversification has fueled a drive to de-escalate stress in the area, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and goals to develop out business and trade ties throughout the Middle East and beyond.
As with Israel, however, whether and how Saudi Arabia translates its expanding leverage into lasting strategic gains stays to be seen. Israel was strongly encouraging of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear centers.

Going forward, Netanyahu will aim to preserve U.S. support, particularly if Iran starts to rebuild its ballistic rocket toolbox or restart enrichment. Israel has made clear that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either scenario. Missing a clear U.S. "traffic signal" opposing more Israeli military intervention in Iran, perhaps coupled with a U.S.Significantly, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the main risk to regional stability. Moving forward, Riyadh will press hard for a diplomatic resolution to Iran's conflict with the United States and Israel. While Saudi Arabia most likely is heartened by Iran's weakened position, it sees with alarm the possibility of deepening interstate dispute in between Israel and Iran.
Latest Posts
Key Advantages of Strategic Excellence for 2026

Comparing Innovative Models Against Traditional Frameworks

Leading Organizational Change in Modern GCC